When somebody says that all statements are false, the obvious problem is that as an assertion it's self-defeating.
We can't make any statements here. We can't talk about the internal politics of Paraguay.
We believe that the statement of objection's preliminary conclusions are wrong as a matter of fact, law, and economics.
Those statements were knowingly false, james and others relied on those statements to his detriment. Penn state knew hazing was taking place and took a 'well, that's what goes on here' kind of attitude, so when they said there was zero tolerance for hazing, that was a false statement and (vivenzio) says he wouldn't have rushed if he'd known about hazing.
This sounds an extraordinary statement to make, but in fact all truth is very ordinary.
This series of self-serving and inaccurate statements would create chaos in the weeks following.